MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?
View Single Post
post #55 of (permalink) Old 01-16-2013, 06:15 PM
country flag MurrayMagic1
Registered User
 
MurrayMagic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Age: 26
Posts: 360
                     
Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

He has been a part of the big four for quite some time now. It is right for Muzz to be part of the big four He has won a GS he has beaten Fed , Nadal and Nole more times than any other active player on the tour plus he is consistent. He has also won quite a lot of titles. It would be wrong for Andy to be placed in the group below the number 4 ranking. because he is simply too good for them he is a class ahead of them.

Andy Murray ---- 2 time grand slam champion. Your argument is invalid.
MurrayMagic1 is offline  
 
 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome