MensTennisForums.com Fan Blogs
Home Page News
Enter Player Forums
Barclays ATP World Tour Finals
BNP Paribas Masters
Davis Cup 2016
General Player Talk
Blast From The Past
Site Discussion & News
Announcements, Site Rules & FAQ
Feedback, Suggestions & Questions
User Banning and Appeal News
33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?
View Single Post
01-16-2013, 06:15 PM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?
He has been a part of the big four for quite some time now. It is right for Muzz to be part of the big four He has won a GS he has beaten Fed , Nadal and Nole more times than any other active player on the tour plus he is consistent. He has also won quite a lot of titles. It would be wrong for Andy to be placed in the group below the number 4 ranking. because he is simply too good for them he is a class ahead of them.
Andy Murray ---- 2 time grand slam champion. Your argument is invalid.
MurrayMagic1 is offline
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MurrayMagic1
-- MensTennisForums.com (Full)
---- MensTennisForums.com (Full Alternate)
-- MensTennisForums.com (Classic)
-- MensTennisForums.com (Mobile)
-- English (US)
-- Español - México
v1.4 Copyright ©2007,
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to