MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - Why are ballbashers more highly regarded than tacticians like Murray?
View Single Post
post #47 of (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 11:02 PM
country flag Orka_n
Registered User
 
Orka_n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 22,930
                     
Re: Why are ballbashers more highly regarded than tacticians like Murray?

Because it's more difficult being a successful attacking player in this shit-slow court era than having a defensive game. Case closed.

I have a more relevant question: if the OP really believes in what he is writing here about smart tennis being entertaining, why does he hate Simon and call him a pusher when he has a game similar to Murray's?

Tea of truth:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyV View Post
We should be appreciative of Federer though, because we will never see anything like him again. The fact he can still compete for slams ever after the erosion of his physical skills is really a greater testament to the natural talent he has than the period of time when he was dominating the tour.
Nadaltards in 2014:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allez View Post
Nadal is by far the most naturally talented player of all time and that is the reason his stay at the top is a lot longer than players like Federer etc were able to do.
Orka_n is offline  
 
 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome