- View Single Post - Endless Federer-Nadal debates
View Single Post
post #1149 of (permalink) Old 09-10-2012, 06:16 AM
country flag rickcastle
Registered User
rickcastle's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 934
Re: Nadal vs Fed slams won by age comparison

Originally Posted by manadrainer View Post
Exactly as saying Fed played in a weak era. Anyone can see watching his game he would have been great in any era.

To add further proof to that Fed decided to come back at #1 well past his prime at 31, in the supposed "stronger era".
Well, of course Ash86's argument applies exclusively to her boyfriend, that goes without saying

And talent is subjective, Murray may be more talented in your eyes but if he doesn't have the results, it doesn't matter. He is not on the level of Federer/Nadal/Djokovic and Hewitt/Roddick continue to be more accomplished than him. I think Nalbandian is more talented than a lot of players who have won slams but in the end, it doesn't matter.
rickcastle is offline  
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome