- View Single Post - Endless Federer-Nadal debates
View Single Post
post #1103 of (permalink) Old 09-05-2012, 08:27 PM
country flag evilmindbulgaria
Registered User
evilmindbulgaria's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,351
Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Originally Posted by Slice Winner View Post
Rafa was a slam contender at all the slams from 2008 on (at least SF in every slam that year).
So if the Nadal-Fed h2h is so important, then Nadal should have stopped Federer from winning USO 2008, RG 2009, Wim 2009, Aus 2010, Wim 2012.
Then Fed would be on 12 slams, and Rafa on something like 16. In that case, the h2h would actually matter.

In real life, the h2h means nothing. Fed is clearly the better player, despite having a match-up issue.

Muzza has a winning h2h with Roger. Is he a greater player? Does it make Fed not the GOAT because of that?
Again, Muzz has never taken Fed out in a slam, so the h2h is almost meaningless.
Great comparison since 9:8 is the same as 18:10 including every surface in a Grand Slam

The moment Rafa-Fed H2H is mentioned Fedtards should humbly bow their heads,say "Too good", and walk away with the little dignity they have left.


Rafa winning at least one slam in 10 consecutive years is the best achievement in Open Era tennis since Laver won all 4 Grand slam tournaments in the same year!

Don't ever underestimate the heart of a champion!
evilmindbulgaria is offline  
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome