Originally Posted by r2473
To simply answer the question as posed (which is more DOMINANT), it has to be Federer... When Federer goes up against ANYBODY he is the prohibitive favorite to win. If he loses, everyone is pretty surprised. With Tiger, though he is the favorite to win most any tournament he enters, when he doesn't, nobody is that surprised.
You're confusing me??... becasue by your own logic Tiger is not just the more impressive but also the more dominant player.
If you're saying even though he is the favorite to win nobody is surprise when he loses it must be becasue
wining a golf tournament is way more difficult than wining a tennis tournament. And if this is the case, then the fact that Tiger has 12 majors (as opposed to Rogers 8 or 9) means he's more dominant over his competitors.
But who cares... I fed-up of seeing both their mugs!