Ah! So now it's 'general opinion' you're relying on. So, how did you measure 'general opinion' without speaking to all women alive today?
I suspect what you're trying to argue is that you read somewhere in a magazine that women prefer hairless men these days whereas before they liked a hairy chest.
EXCEPT - the average magazine asks a few hundred women in the Western city they operate in for an opinion on something, they then put that out as 'women today' or 'the majority of women' or some other such sweeping statement.
That's terribly arrogant. There are some 3 billion women in the world and a few hundred women in New York or London do not represent womanhood as a whole.
So, unless you know how millions of women in swathes of Africa, rural China and India etc etc feel about this topic you can't argue for 'general opinion' or 'most women' or any such sweeping generality.
So, how about you just say that YOU don't like hairy chests. That way no-one can argue with you other than give their individual view in return.
I rely on general opinon of women today, how according to you general opinion is made about anything,by talking to every single person on earth???did you ever heard about statistics in your life ,general opinion is not made from all population ,but from little portion of population.Nobody can make general opinion from all population,that cost too much money and time .
100 years ago women didn't shave their body ,things have changed ,standards of women beauty have changed ,general opinion today is that women body looks better without hair ,are you going to argue that ?
Standard of man attractivness have also changed during years, the fact that you see so much hairless body today ,means that standards have changed ,and they 've changed because general opinion is that body looks better without hair.
The women you menation in disscusion just for the purpose of watering what I am saying couldn't care less for things like this,hair or no hear ,they have other priorities in life, like how to stay in life