Well, as someone who has been wondering how far down the men's rankings she'd have to go to find someone she thought was really good-looking, I didn't see an option that suited me, so didn't vote. But I have to say, if we're talking late 70s Borg, McEnroe, Connors and who was no. 4? Gerulaitis? wouldn't have done wonders for me (I went off Borg, looks-wise, when he went into what I call his "Jesus" phase!).
So, as far as I'm concerned: with Roger, I feel that sometimes the various components of his features work well together, and sometimes they don't do so well
; Rafa I'd probably say was fairly good-looking, but I wouldn't say that Novak was; and it has to be said that Jamie is the better-looking Murray brother, even if his tennis isn't as good. But ultimately, it's their tennis-playing ability which matters more than their looks, fortunately
- tennis isn't a beauty contest. As for modelling, advertisers like to go for all sorts of male faces, including ones I find pretty ugly, or weird, so saying that someone could be a male model isn't necessarily such a compliment.