Complaints About the US Open -
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 1 (permalink) Old 10-24-2011, 04:11 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,109
Complaints About the US Open

Before we begin any type of honest discussion about any tournament really, we need to admit an honest truth to ourselves: tennis fans love to complain. Whether it’s about alleged doping, draw-rigging, match-fixing scandals, organization of tournaments, or even just a player we don’t like winning, tennis fans love to complain. It’s almost become part of the sport now. Every fan has something they want to complain about. And when they don’t, they find something new to complain about.

American tennis, and along with it the US Open, has been an excellent scapegoat for fans to complain about in recent years. It doesn’t help that American tennis has had no player at the very top level of the game for the first time in history. It doesn’t help that America’s standard-bearer since 2005, Andy Roddick, has a very hit-or-miss personality to say the least. And what certainly hasn’t helped has been the management of the US Open.

The US Open, like the French Open, wants very much to be the premier Grand Slam event. It certainly has its unique and attractive qualities. Unfortunately, the US Open is fighting a very tough battle. No matter how much it wishes it weren’t true, the US Open (or the French Open) just cannot compete with Wimbledon in terms of history, tradition, and prestige. And no matter what quirks the US Open has, it will never match Wimbledon.

The tournament itself has three unique qualities that separate it from the other Slams. The first, and most obvious one, is that the US Open has a fifth-set tiebreaker. The pros and cons of having the breaker, as opposed to actually having someone actually break their opponent’s serve to be able to win in the fifth set, can be a pretty fair debate in and of itself. On the one hand, it seems like a much fairer way to decide what was obviously a pretty even match. On the other hand, extended fifth sets can be unfair to the winner, especially if they have a short turnaround before their next match (for an extreme example, see John Isner in Wimbledon 2010). Regardless, being different than all three other Slams is a good excuse for fans to complain. Tennis fans, especially non-American ones, like to see this as an example of American stubbornness and laziness in not wanting the match to be completely fought out.

To read the entire article, please click here. As always, thoughts and opinions are welcome and requested.

Could Prize Money Per Set Be a Solution to Grand Slam Prize Money Disputes?
yesh222 is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome